HD Graphics P4600 vs Radeon HD 8180

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8180 with HD Graphics P4600, including specs and performance data.

HD 8180
2013
4 Watt
0.32

HD Graphics P4600 outperforms HD 8180 by a whopping 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13761035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.151.33
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameKalindiHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateNovember 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128160
Core clock speed225 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt84 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80024.00
Floating-point processing power0.0576 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8180 0.32
HD Graphics P4600 1.45
+353%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8180 134
Samples: 105
HD Graphics P4600 605
+351%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Valorant 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Valorant 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Valorant 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 1.45
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 84 Watt

HD 8180 has 2000% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4600, on the other hand, has a 353.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8180 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8180 is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8180
Radeon HD 8180
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 51 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8180 or HD Graphics P4600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.