Radeon RX 6750 XT vs HD 8970M Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 8970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
18.63

RX 6750 XT outperforms HD 8970M Crossfire by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.88
Power efficiency6.3914.82
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNeptune CFNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed850 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data416.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.31 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8970M Crossfire 18.63
RX 6750 XT 54.05
+190%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8970M Crossfire 12424
RX 6750 XT 48327
+289%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8970M Crossfire 34215
RX 6750 XT 104004
+204%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8970M Crossfire 10354
RX 6750 XT 37609
+263%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8970M Crossfire 70114
RX 6750 XT 170993
+144%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8970M Crossfire 269832
RX 6750 XT 529598
+96.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD67
−143%
163
+143%
1440p27−30
−215%
85
+215%
4K16−18
−206%
49
+206%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.37
1440pno data6.46
4Kno data11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−450%
165
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−160%
110−120
+160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−194%
90−95
+194%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−171%
170−180
+171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−167%
100−110
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−323%
127
+323%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−133%
100−110
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−84%
210−220
+84%
Hitman 3 35−40
−205%
110−120
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−124%
200−210
+124%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−118%
110−120
+118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−237%
210−220
+237%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−61.8%
140−150
+61.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−160%
110−120
+160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−194%
90−95
+194%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−171%
170−180
+171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−167%
100−110
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−263%
109
+263%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−133%
100−110
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−84%
210−220
+84%
Hitman 3 35−40
−205%
110−120
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−124%
200−210
+124%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−118%
110−120
+118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−383%
304
+383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−160%
110−120
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−61.8%
140−150
+61.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−160%
110−120
+160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−194%
90−95
+194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−167%
100−110
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−227%
98
+227%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−133%
100−110
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−84%
210−220
+84%
Hitman 3 35−40
−205%
110−120
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−126%
210
+126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−313%
260
+313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−214%
135
+214%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−10.1%
98
+10.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−118%
110−120
+118%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−203%
110−120
+203%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−221%
60−65
+221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−276%
60−65
+276%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−205%
60−65
+205%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−445%
60
+445%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−153%
260−270
+153%
Hitman 3 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−305%
158
+305%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−260%
126
+260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−389%
186
+389%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−300%
85−90
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−96.5%
220−230
+96.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−188%
90−95
+188%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−211%
55−60
+211%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Hitman 3 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−117%
210−220
+117%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−280%
75−80
+280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−316%
79
+316%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−550%
26
+550%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−371%
99
+371%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−413%
41
+413%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−206%
50−55
+206%

This is how HD 8970M Crossfire and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 143% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 215% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 206% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6750 XT surpassed HD 8970M Crossfire in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.63 54.05
Recency 1 May 2012 3 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

HD 8970M Crossfire has 25% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 190.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2592 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.