Radeon RX 5700M vs HD 8970M Crossfire
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon RX 5700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 8970M Crossfire outperforms 5700M by a whopping 346% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 353 | 760 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.56 | 1.63 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | Neptune CF | Navi 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 1 March 2020 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1465 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 247.7 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 144 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 8 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 69
+393%
| 14−16
−393%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+553%
|
14−16
−553%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+363%
|
8−9
−363%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+387%
|
14−16
−387%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+553%
|
14−16
−553%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+363%
|
8−9
−363%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+418%
|
10−12
−418%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+327%
|
21−24
−327%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+274%
|
18−20
−274%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+440%
|
10−11
−440%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+306%
|
16−18
−306%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+155%
|
50−55
−155%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+387%
|
14−16
−387%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+553%
|
14−16
−553%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 128
+85.5%
|
65−70
−85.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+363%
|
8−9
−363%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+194%
|
35−40
−194%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+418%
|
10−12
−418%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+327%
|
21−24
−327%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+274%
|
18−20
−274%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+440%
|
10−11
−440%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+442%
|
12−14
−442%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+429%
|
7−8
−429%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+306%
|
16−18
−306%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+300%
|
12−14
−300%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+155%
|
50−55
−155%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+387%
|
14−16
−387%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+363%
|
8−9
−363%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+194%
|
35−40
−194%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+418%
|
10−12
−418%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+274%
|
18−20
−274%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+306%
|
16−18
−306%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+300%
|
12−14
−300%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+155%
|
50−55
−155%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 90−95
+327%
|
21−24
−327%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+325%
|
8−9
−325%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+338%
|
27−30
−338%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+1350%
|
2−3
−1350%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+416%
|
30−35
−416%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+320%
|
40−45
−320%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+390%
|
10−11
−390%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+443%
|
7−8
−443%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+378%
|
9−10
−378%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+333%
|
6−7
−333%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+471%
|
7−8
−471%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+113%
|
14−16
−113%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+400%
|
5−6
−400%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+416%
|
18−20
−416%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+408%
|
12−14
−408%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+500%
|
5−6
−500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
This is how HD 8970M Crossfire and RX 5700M compete in popular games:
- HD 8970M Crossfire is 393% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8970M Crossfire is 1350% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, HD 8970M Crossfire surpassed RX 5700M in all 54 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.04 | 3.82 |
| Recency | 1 May 2012 | 1 March 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 180 Watt |
HD 8970M Crossfire has a 346% higher aggregate performance score.
RX 5700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 11% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
