ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.47no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)no data
GPU code nameNeptune CFRage Pro Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed850 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.08
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amountno data4 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.16.0
OpenGLno data1.1
OpenCLno dataNone

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2012 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm

HD 8970M Crossfire has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and 3D Rage PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo
3D Rage PRO Turbo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.