Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs HD 8790M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8790M with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.

HD 8790M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
2.95

RX 6750 GRE outperforms HD 8790M by a whopping 1328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.11
Power efficiencyno data13.55
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMarsNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors950 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown250 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60413.0
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs24160
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8790M 2.95
RX 6750 GRE 42.13
+1328%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8790M Samples: 70 1305
RX 6750 GRE Samples: 29 18630
+1328%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.57

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Fortnite 16−18
−1312%
240−250
+1312%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1275%
220−230
+1275%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Valorant 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 73
−1270%
1000−1050
+1270%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Dota 2 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Fortnite 16−18
−1312%
240−250
+1312%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1275%
220−230
+1275%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Valorant 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Dota 2 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1275%
220−230
+1275%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Valorant 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−1312%
240−250
+1312%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Valorant 30−35
−1190%
400−450
+1190%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1275%
220−230
+1275%
Valorant 16−18
−1275%
220−230
+1275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

This is how HD 8790M and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE is 1150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.95 42.13
Recency 1 April 2013 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6750 GRE has a 1328.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8790M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8790M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Radeon HD 8790M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 361 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8790M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 246 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8790M or Radeon RX 6750 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.