GeForce GT 620M vs Radeon HD 8750A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.23
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 February 2013 (12 years ago)23 August 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed600 MHzUp to 625 MHz
Boost clock speedno data715 MHz
Number of transistors950 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4010.56
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 BitUp to 128bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sUp to 28.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2013 23 August 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8750A has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 620M, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and GeForce GT 620M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GeForce GT 620M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 471 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750A or GeForce GT 620M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.