Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs HD 8690M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8690M with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

HD 8690M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.35

RX 7650 GRE outperforms HD 8690M by a whopping 1507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking872126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.95
Power efficiencyno data17.43
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameSunNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed775 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors690 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data165 Watt
Texture fill rate16.50345.0
Floating-point processing power0.528 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8690M 2.35
RX 7650 GRE 37.76
+1507%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8690M 984
RX 7650 GRE 15824
+1508%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−1488%
270−280
+1488%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Fortnite 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1
Valorant 40−45
−1448%
650−700
+1448%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1496%
750−800
+1496%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Dota 2 24−27
−1500%
400−450
+1500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Fortnite 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Valorant 40−45
−1448%
650−700
+1448%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Dota 2 24−27
−1500%
400−450
+1500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Valorant 40−45
−1448%
650−700
+1448%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1488%
270−280
+1488%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Valorant 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1500%
240−250
+1500%
Valorant 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

This is how HD 8690M and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 1488% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 37.76
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

RX 7650 GRE has a 1506.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8690M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8690M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Radeon HD 8690M
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 24 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8690M or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.