GeForce GT 625M vs Radeon HD 8690M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8690M and GeForce GT 625M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8690M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.56
+106%

HD 8690M outperforms GT 625M by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8291043
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.70
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameSunGF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed775 MHzUp to 625 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.5010.00
Floating-point processing power0.528 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sUp to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8690M 2.56
+106%
GT 625M 1.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8690M 984
+106%
GT 625M 478

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8690M 1600
+73.7%
GT 625M 921

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+114%
7−8
−114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Elden Ring 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Elden Ring 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Fortnite 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
World of Tanks 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD 8690M and GT 625M compete in popular games:

  • HD 8690M is 114% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 8690M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8690M is ahead in 37 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.56 1.24
Recency 1 March 2013 1 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB

HD 8690M has a 106.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

GT 625M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon HD 8690M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Radeon HD 8690M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GeForce GT 625M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 97 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 33 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.