Radeon RX 590 vs HD 8670D

Place in the ranking	1006	227
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	25.45
Power efficiency	0.96	9.63
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Devastator	Polaris 30
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	12 March 2013 (11 years ago)	15 November 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2304
Core clock speed	844 MHz	1469 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	1545 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	22.80	222.5
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	24	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8670D 1.38

RX 590 24.33
+1663%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8670D 533

RX 590 9390
+1662%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8670D 1547

RX 590 23363
+1410%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8670D 6241

RX 590 48454
+676%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8670D 1157

RX 590 16814
+1353%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8670D 8288

RX 590 86825
+948%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 −513%	98 +513%
1440p	3−4 −1767%	56 +1767%
4K	2−3 −1750%	37 +1750%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.85
1440p	no data	4.98
4K	no data	7.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−900%

40−45
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −983%	65 +983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1625%	69 +1625%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4400%	90 +4400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2900%	90 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −9033%	274 +9033%
Hitman 3	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1907%	301 +1907%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −4450%	91 +4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1650%	140 +1650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −724%	272 +724%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1783%	113 +1783%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1500%	64 +1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3600%	74 +3600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2267%	71 +2267%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8533%	259 +8533%
Hitman 3	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1813%	287 +1813%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −3600%	74 +3600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1325%	114 +1325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −382%	50−55 +382%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −691%	261 +691%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −550%	39 +550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1050%	46 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2650%	55 +2650%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2933%	91 +2933%
Hitman 3	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −540%	96 +540%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1150%	100 +1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −364%	51 +364%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −6.1%	35 +6.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3100%

64
+3100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −4500%	45−50 +4500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	38
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Hitman 3	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1340%	72 +1340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −2800%	203 +2800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−975%

43
+975%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−2500%

26
+2500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1800%	19 +1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	20
Far Cry 5	0−1	17

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−900%

30
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	86 +0%	86 +0%
Battlefield 5	136 +0%	136 +0%
Metro Exodus	124 +0%	124 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	73 +0%	73 +0%
Battlefield 5	122 +0%	122 +0%
Metro Exodus	97 +0%	97 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 +0%	55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	58 +0%	58 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70 +0%	70 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Hitman 3	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	57 +0%	57 +0%
Metro Exodus	36 +0%	36 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +0%	32 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	46 +0%	46 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40 +0%	40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	13 +0%	13 +0%

This is how HD 8670D and RX 590 compete in popular games:

RX 590 is 513% faster in 1080p
RX 590 is 1767% faster in 1440p
RX 590 is 1750% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 590 is 9033% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 590 is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.38	24.33
Recency	12 March 2013	15 November 2018
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	175 Watt

HD 8670D has 75% lower power consumption.

RX 590, on the other hand, has a 1663% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8670D in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.