Quadro P620 vs Radeon HD 8650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650M with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

HD 8650M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
2.02

P620 outperforms HD 8650M by a whopping 365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking888471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.37
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2013 (12 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed650 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1443 MHz
Number of transistors900 Million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data46.18
Floating-point processing powerno data1.478 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8650M 2.02
Quadro P620 9.39
+365%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8650M 1050
Quadro P620 4673
+345%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8650M 7500
Quadro P620 30410
+305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−380%
48
+380%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Dota 2 4−5
−650%
30
+650%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−357%
64
+357%
Fortnite 10−11
−460%
55−60
+460%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−525%
125
+525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
World of Tanks 35−40
−254%
130−140
+254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Dota 2 4−5
−1975%
83
+1975%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−179%
35−40
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−238%
40−45
+238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
World of Tanks 12−14
−423%
65−70
+423%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Valorant 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Fortnite 0−1 10−11
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 7−8
Valorant 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how HD 8650M and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 380% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P620 is 1975% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is ahead in 46 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 9.39
Recency 7 January 2013 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Quadro P620 has a 364.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650M is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650M
Radeon HD 8650M
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 638 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.