HD Graphics 2000 vs Radeon HD 8650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650M and HD Graphics 2000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8650M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
1.93
+264%

HD 8650M outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9301263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameno dataSandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2013 (12 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed650 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors900 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no dataunknown
Texture fill rateno data8.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+264%
11
−264%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dead Island 2 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dead Island 2 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Valorant 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dead Island 2 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dead Island 2 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dead Island 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD 8650M and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • HD 8650M is 264% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8650M is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8650M is ahead in 30 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 0.53
Recency 7 January 2013 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

HD 8650M has a 264.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8650M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650M
Radeon HD 8650M
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650M or HD Graphics 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.