ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking811not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataMach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameno dataMach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)1992 (32 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed720 / 775 MHz10 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm700 nm
ROPsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataISA 16 Bit
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DRAM
Maximum RAM amountno data2 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11N/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 700 nm

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics has a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and Graphics Ultra Pro ISA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Graphics Ultra Pro ISA is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA
Graphics Ultra Pro ISA

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro ISA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.