HD Graphics 610 vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics and HD Graphics 610, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
2013
2.75
+48.6%

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 610 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking802917
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.53
Architectureno dataGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataKaby Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed720 / 825 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)no data5 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 2.75
+48.6%
HD Graphics 610 1.85

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 2353
+167%
HD Graphics 610 880

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 5999
+61.5%
HD Graphics 610 3715

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 1303
+114%
HD Graphics 610 608

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 10355
+96.1%
HD Graphics 610 5281

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
+42.9%
7
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Elden Ring 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 7−8
+75%
4
−75%
Elden Ring 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+129%
7
−129%
Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
World of Tanks 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
World of Tanks 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics and HD Graphics 610 compete in popular games:

  • HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is 300% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 610 is 57% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is ahead in 37 tests (76%)
  • HD Graphics 610 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.75 1.85
Recency 1 August 2013 30 August 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics has a 48.6% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 610, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 610 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G HD 8750M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 537 votes

Rate HD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.