Radeon RX 7600M vs HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Aggregated performance score
RX 7600M outperforms HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics by a whopping 269% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 763 | 408 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.94 | no data |
Architecture | no data | RDNA 3 |
GPU code name | no data | Navi 33 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 August 2013 (10 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Current price | $105 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 720 / 825 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2070 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 13,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | no data | 246.4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 16000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−125%
|
27−30
+125%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−575%
|
27−30
+575%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−414%
|
35−40
+414%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−144%
|
21−24
+144%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−125%
|
27−30
+125%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−575%
|
27−30
+575%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−414%
|
35−40
+414%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−144%
|
21−24
+144%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−200%
|
21−24
+200%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−575%
|
27−30
+575%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−414%
|
35−40
+414%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−200%
|
21−24
+200%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−200%
|
14−16
+200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 10−11 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M is 1700% faster than the HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 7600M surpassed HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics in all 53 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.76 | 10.18 |
Recency | 1 August 2013 | 5 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
The Radeon RX 7600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.