UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon HD 8410G

Place in performance ranking	1042	549
Place by popularity	not in top-100	22
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	1.28
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Alder Lake
GPU code name	Trinity	Alder Lake xG
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$338	$878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 770 has 4167% better value for money than HD 8410G.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	32
Core clock speed	450 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.640	26.40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8410G and UHD Graphics 770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	IGP	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1550 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8410G 1.13

UHD Graphics 770 6.14
+443%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon HD 8410G by 443% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 8410G 435

UHD Graphics 770 2761
+535%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon HD 8410G by 535% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
4K	2−3 −600%	14 +600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−300%

12
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Hitman 3	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −108%	27 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −127%	24−27 +127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Hitman 3	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −123%	27−30 +123%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −138%	19 +138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −127%	24−27 +127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −113%	17 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −125%	9 +125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −127%	24−27 +127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−1600%

16−18
+1600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	5−6

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−175%

10−12
+175%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	0−1	3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−200%

6−7
+200%

This is how HD 8410G and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 770 is 467% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 770 is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8410G is 8% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games: