ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs HD 8410G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8180 8210 8210E 8240 Mobile IGP 8250 8280 Mobile IGP 8280E 8310E 8310G 8330 Mobile IGP 8330E 8350G 8400 Mobile IGP 8400E 8410G 8450G 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8510G 8530M 8550G 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 8550M 8570A 8570M 8590M 8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M 8730A 8730M 8750A 8750M 8770M 8790M 8830M 8850M 8870M 8950M 8970M 8970M Crossfire
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8410G and Mobility Radeon HD 5650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8410G
2013
35 Watt
1.04

Mobility HD 5650 outperforms HD 8410G by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 8410G HD 8410G
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility HD 5650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11471079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.296.47
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameScrapperMadison
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192400
Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.6409.000
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1220
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12−14
−25%
15
+25%
Full HD12−14
−33.3%
16
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−50%
39
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Valorant 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Valorant 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Valorant 0−1 3−4

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Low

Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 8410G and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 25% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 performs better in 23 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.04 1.26
Recency 23 May 2013 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8410G has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has a 21.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
vs
GeForce 800A GeForce 800A
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
HD 8670M Radeon HD 8670M
HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M
HD Graphics 4200 Intel Graphics 4200
vs
Pro WX 4200 4200
HD 7500G AMD HD 7500G
vs
HD 8470 OEM 8470 OEM
HD 7500G AMD HD 7500G
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9500 9500
HD 8450G AMD HD 8450G
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5650 5650
HD 7470M AMD HD 7470M
vs
RTX 3070 Ti GA102 3070 Ti GA102
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4100 IGP 4100 IGP
GT 520MX NVIDIA GT 520MX
vs
Pro Vega 20 Vega 20
GT 520MX NVIDIA GT 520MX
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs G7 80EUs
GT 520MX NVIDIA GT 520MX
vs
RTX 4090 4090
GT 520MX NVIDIA GT 520MX
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 285 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8410G or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.