AMD Radeon HD 8400 vs Silicon Motion SM502
Comparison of Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
23 May 2013
1 January 2007
Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
/ Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
APIs supported by Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 8400
Much newer (23 May 2013 vs 1 January 2007)
Advantages of Silicon Motion SM502
We are unaware of any advantages of Silicon Motion SM502 over AMD Radeon HD 8400.
So, HD 8400 or Silicon Motion SM502?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon HD 8400 and Silicon Motion SM502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.