AMD Radeon HD 8400 vs ATI IGP 340M

General info

Comparison of Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
GCN
 
Rage 6
Code name
Kabini
 
RS200
Type
Laptop
 
Laptop
Release date
23 May 2013
 
5 October 2002

Technical specs

Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
128
 
2
Core clock speed
600 MHz
 
183 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
 
180 MHz
Transistor count
no data
 
30 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
180 nm
Texture fill rate
no data
 
0.37

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface
no data
 
AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
no data
 
System Shared
Shared memory
+
 
+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
no data
 
No outputs

API support

APIs supported by Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
 
7.0
OpenGL
no data
 
1.4

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

HD 8400 1.17 +431.8%
ATI IGP 340M 0.22

Passmark

HD 8400 254 +12600%
ATI IGP 340M 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 8400

431.8% faster (about 5.5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (23 May 2013 vs 5 October 2002)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 180 nm)

Advantages of ATI Radeon IGP 340M

HyperZ memory optimization technology Pixel Tapestry architecture Multi-texturing with 3 texture units On-chip texel
pixel
and vertex caches Supports 3D textures and Microsoft DirectX texture compression Support for Emboss
Dot-Product 3
and Cubic Environment bump mapping Bilinear
trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA) Alpha blending Exponential pixel fog 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer
32-bit or 16-bit W buffer
and 8-bit Stencil buffer Extensive 3D mode support Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes

So, HD 8400 or IGP 340M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon HD 8400.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon IGP 340M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
AMD Radeon HD 8400
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon HD 8400 or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
AliExpress WW