GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon HD 8370D IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated196
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data42.63
Power efficiencyno data17.32
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteTU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateJuly 2013 (11 years ago)14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281408
Core clock speed760 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate6.080157.1
Floating-point processing power0.1946 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

HD 8370D IGP has 84.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8370D IGP and GeForce GTX 1660. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
Radeon HD 8370D IGP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 105 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8370D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5664 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8370D IGP or GeForce GTX 1660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.