ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs HD 8350G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8350G with Radeon HD 4650 AGP, including specs and performance data.

HD 8350G
2013
35 Watt
0.64
+30.6%

HD 8350G outperforms HD 4650 AGP by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12531300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.410.79
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2013 (13 years ago)10 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128320
Core clock speed514 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate5.76019.20
Floating-point processing power0.1843 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8350G 0.64
+30.6%
ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8350G 267
+29%
Samples: 30
ATI HD 4650 AGP 207
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Valorant 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD 8350G and ATI HD 4650 AGP compete in popular games:

  • HD 8350G is 43% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.49
Recency 12 March 2013 10 September 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 48 Watt

HD 8350G has a 31% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 72% more advanced lithography process, and 37% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 AGP in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8350G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8350G or Radeon HD 4650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.