Radeon HD 8350G: specs and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

Radeon HD 8350G provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 0.58% of a leader's which is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell.

Summary

AMD started Radeon HD 8350G sales 12 March 2013. This is a TeraScale 3 architecture notebook card based on 32 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated graphics card. Power consumption is at 35 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Radeon HD 8350G: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking1242
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Power efficiency1.33of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameScrapper Lite
Market segmentLaptop
Release date12 March 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Radeon HD 8350G's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 8350G's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128of 960 (GeForce GTX 660)
Core clock speed514 MHzof 980 (GeForce GT 755M SLI)
Boost clock speed720 MHzof 1000 (HD Graphics (Haswell))
Number of transistors1,303 millionof 100,000 million (Data Center GPU Max 1100)
Manufacturing process technology32 nmof 0.003 MB (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 235 (FirePro S9150)
Texture fill rate5.760of 1,968 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell)
Floating-point processing power0.1843 TFLOPSof 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell)
ROPs4of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000)
TMUs8of 896 (Data Center GPU Max 1350)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon HD 8350G and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfaceIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 8350G: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedof 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedof 384 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedof 16384000 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile)
Shared memory+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 8350G. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API and SDK support

APIs supported by Radeon HD 8350G, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.0
OpenGL4.4of 4.6 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell)
OpenCL1.2
VulkanN/A

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon HD 8350G. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8350G
0.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8350G 258
Samples: 29

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8350G 624

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8350G 2463

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8350G 388

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8350G 2942

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8350G 46807

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon HD 8350G is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
Valorant 27−30

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Dota 2 11
Far Cry 5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
Metro Exodus 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Valorant 27−30

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Dota 2 10
Far Cry 5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Valorant 27−30

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
Valorant 3−4

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3

Closest competitors

Radeon HD 8350G's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook graphics cards.


NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon HD 8350G is GeForce Go 7950 GTX, which is faster by 2% and higher by 5 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 8350G:

GeForce 410M 105.17
Radeon HD 8350G 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon HD 8350G according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Radeon HD 8350G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8350G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.