ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT vs HD 8350 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.87
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCedarRV610
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8040
Core clock speed650 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors292 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2002.600
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS0.052 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed667 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2013 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 25 Watt

HD 8350 OEM has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8350 OEM and Radeon HD 2400 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
Radeon HD 8350 OEM
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Radeon HD 2400 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8350 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.