FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 8330E

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8330E with FireStream 9250, including specs and performance data.

HD 8330E
2013
15 Watt
0.68

FireStream 9250 outperforms HD 8330E by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1179775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.111.38
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameKalindiRV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2013 (11 years ago)16 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128800
Core clock speed497 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97625.00
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared993 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data63.55 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8330E 0.68
FireStream 9250 3.02
+344%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8330E 262
FireStream 9250 1164
+344%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 3.02
Recency 23 April 2013 16 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

HD 8330E has an age advantage of 4 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9250, on the other hand, has a 344.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The FireStream 9250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8330E in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330E is a notebook card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330E
Radeon HD 8330E
AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.