GeForce GT 240M vs GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	342	1208
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.21	1.66
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	GP107	GT216
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	15 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	48
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	23 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	8.800
Floating-point processing power	2.488 TFLOPS	0.1162 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	174
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	48	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	Up to 600 (DDR2), Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	no data	8.0
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.39
+2698%

GT 240M 0.55

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 30690
+1194%

GT 240M 2372

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 +367%	12 −367%
1440p	25	0−1
4K	17	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +975%	4−5 −975%
Battlefield 5	59 +2850%	2−3 −2850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
Far Cry 5	47 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +550%	6−7 −550%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +825%	4−5 −825%
Battlefield 5	49 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
Far Cry 5	44 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +2750%	2−3 −2750%
Metro Exodus	19	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +450%	6−7 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +370%	10−11 −370%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Battlefield 5	42 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Far Cry 5	40 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +4200%	1−2 −4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +160%	10−11 −160%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21	0−1
Metro Exodus	12	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	0−1
Battlefield 5	29 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Far Cry 5	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Far Cry New Dawn	27	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +3900%	2−3 −3900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4	0−1
Metro Exodus	7	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Battlefield 5	14−16	0−1
Far Cry 5	12	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	13	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	0−1

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and GT 240M compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 367% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 4500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 13 tests (37%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.39	0.55
Recency	3 January 2017	15 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	23 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 2698.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240M, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.