GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI vs Radeon HD 8330

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1169not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameKalindiG71M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 August 2013 (11 years ago)12 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12864
Core clock speed497 MHz16 MHz
Boost clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976no data
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2x512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)GDDR3
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 12 October 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 90 Watt

HD 8330 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330
Radeon HD 8330
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 177 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.