Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs AMD Radeon HD 8330
Price now
143$
Games supported
48%
- Interface IGP
- Core clock speed 500
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 575
- Max video memory Up to 512 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory clock speed Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
163$
Games supported
48%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1097 | 1098 |
| Value for money | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Kabini | N12M-GS |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (10 years old) | 6 January 2011 (12 years old) |
| Current price | $143 | $163 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 48 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.976 | 4.600 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 110.4 gflops |
| Gigaflops | no data | 73 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce 410M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | Up to 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 12.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | no data | 8.0 |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | + |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon HD 8330 outperforms GeForce 410M by 2% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Radeon HD 8330 outperforms GeForce 410M by 1% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce 410M outperforms Radeon HD 8330 by 6% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
Radeon HD 8330 outperforms GeForce 410M by 28% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce 410M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | no data | 7 Mh/s |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 11
+37.5%
| 8
−37.5%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how HD 8330 and GeForce 410M compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- HD 8330 is 37.5% faster than GeForce 410M
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 8330 is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
- GeForce 410M is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (100%)
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce 410M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
