HD 8180 vs HD 8250

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 501$
Games supported 48%
AMD Radeon HD 8250
Radeon HD 8250
Buy
  • Interface IGP
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory System Shared
  • Memory type System Shared
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon HD 8180
Radeon HD 8180
Buy
  • Interface IGP
  • Core clock speed 225
  • Max video memory System Shared
  • Memory type System Shared
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 39%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating1073not rated
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameTemashTemash
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2013
(9 years old)
23 May 2013
(9 years old)
Current price$501 no data
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128128
Core clock speed300 MHz225 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)8 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001.800

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon HD 8250 and Radeon HD 8180 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceIGPIGP

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


  • Passmark
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 8250 209
+51.4%
HD 8180 138

Radeon HD 8250 outperforms Radeon HD 8180 by 51% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

HD 8250 1317
+66.7%
HD 8180 790

Radeon HD 8250 outperforms Radeon HD 8180 by 67% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

HD 8250 423
+57.6%
HD 8180 268

Radeon HD 8250 outperforms Radeon HD 8180 by 58% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

HD 8250 235
+42.1%
HD 8180 165

Radeon HD 8250 outperforms Radeon HD 8180 by 42% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

HD 8250 1965
+31.6%
HD 8180 1493

Radeon HD 8250 outperforms Radeon HD 8180 by 32% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

HD 8250 254
+74.8%
HD 8180 145

Radeon HD 8250 outperforms Radeon HD 8180 by 75% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Advantages and disadvantages


Thermal design power (TDP) 8 Watt 4 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon HD 8250
Radeon HD 8250

and

AMD Radeon HD 8180
Radeon HD 8180

We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon HD 8250 by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8250 from NVIDIA is GeForce GT 330M.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M GeForce GT 330M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 8250:

Competitors of Radeon HD 8180 by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8180 from NVIDIA is GeForce 9650M GS.

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS GeForce 9650M GS
Compare

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 5 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.