UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon HD 8210

Place in the ranking	1236	661
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.20	20.59
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Kalindi	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	31 January 2014 (10 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	256
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,178 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	8 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.400	20.80
Floating-point processing power	0.0768 TFLOPS	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	8	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8210 0.49

UHD Graphics 750 4.50
+818%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8210 190

UHD Graphics 750 1733
+812%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−800%

45−50
+800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
−800%

18−20

+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Hitman 3	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Hitman 3	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Hitman 3	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−300%

8−9
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD 8210 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is 800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 25 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 36 tests (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.49	4.50
Recency	31 January 2014	30 March 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	8 Watt	15 Watt

HD 8210 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 818.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.