GeForce 205 OEM vs Radeon HD 8210
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1232 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.27 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Kalindi | GT218 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 26 November 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 260 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.400 | 4.712 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0768 TFLOPS | 0.04486 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 January 2014 | 26 November 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 31 Watt |
HD 8210 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 287.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce 205 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook card while GeForce 205 OEM is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
