GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 7970M

Place in the ranking	475	688
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.35	1.89
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Wimbledon	N10E-GTX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	256
Core clock speed	850 MHz	576 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	68.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.176 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	80	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	1020 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	10
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970M 9.26
+124%

GTX 285M SLI 4.14

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7970M 21938
+95.3%

GTX 285M SLI 11233

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
Full HD	60 +0%	60 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+100%

7−8

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +144%	24−27 −144%
Hitman 3	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +82.1%	27−30 −82.1%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +39.5%	40−45 −39.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +144%	24−27 −144%
Hitman 3	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +82.1%	27−30 −82.1%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +39.5%	40−45 −39.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +144%	24−27 −144%
Hitman 3	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +82.1%	27−30 −82.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +39.5%	40−45 −39.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+127%

10−12

−127%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +550%	6−7 −550%
Hitman 3	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +123%	24−27 −123%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+87.5%

8−9

−87.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +3600%	1−2 −3600%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+80%

5−6

−80%

This is how HD 7970M and GTX 285M SLI compete in popular games:

HD 7970M is 140% faster in 900p
A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7970M is 3600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, HD 7970M surpassed GTX 285M SLI in all 65 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.26	4.14
Recency	24 April 2012	2 March 2009
Chip lithography	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt

HD 7970M has a 123.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7970M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.