ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire vs HD 7970M Crossfire
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 7970M Crossfire outperforms Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 395 | 687 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.53 | 2.99 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Wimbledon XT | Broadway-XT |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2x1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 132
+149%
| 53
−149%
|
| Full HD | 102
+88.9%
| 54
−88.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+295%
|
21−24
−295%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+237%
|
18−20
−237%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+295%
|
21−24
−295%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+220%
|
14−16
−220%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
+196%
|
27−30
−196%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+177%
|
21−24
−177%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+254%
|
12−14
−254%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+184%
|
18−20
−184%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+103%
|
60−65
−103%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+237%
|
18−20
−237%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+295%
|
21−24
−295%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200
+140%
|
80−85
−140%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| Dota 2 | 90−95
+127%
|
40−45
−127%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+220%
|
14−16
−220%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
+196%
|
27−30
−196%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+177%
|
21−24
−177%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+254%
|
12−14
−254%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+244%
|
16−18
−244%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+244%
|
9−10
−244%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+184%
|
18−20
−184%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+179%
|
14−16
−179%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+103%
|
60−65
−103%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+237%
|
18−20
−237%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| Dota 2 | 90−95
+127%
|
40−45
−127%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+220%
|
14−16
−220%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+177%
|
21−24
−177%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+184%
|
18−20
−184%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+179%
|
14−16
−179%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+103%
|
60−65
−103%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 80−85
+196%
|
27−30
−196%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+211%
|
9−10
−211%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+203%
|
35−40
−203%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+321%
|
30−35
−321%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
+188%
|
50−55
−188%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+925%
|
4−5
−925%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+256%
|
9−10
−256%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+227%
|
10−12
−227%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+220%
|
5−6
−220%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
+267%
|
9−10
−267%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 80−85
+238%
|
24−27
−238%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+231%
|
16−18
−231%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7
−317%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+180%
|
5−6
−180%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
+200%
|
5−6
−200%
|
This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire compete in popular games:
- HD 7970M Crossfire is 149% faster in 900p
- HD 7970M Crossfire is 89% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7970M Crossfire is 950% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, HD 7970M Crossfire surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire in all 60 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.71 | 4.44 |
| Recency | 1 May 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
HD 7970M Crossfire has a 208.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
