GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7290 7330M 7350M 7370M 7400G 7410M 7420G 7430M 7450A 7450M 7470A 7470M 7490M 7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M 7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand 7730M 7750M 7770M 7850M 7870M 7950M 7970M 7970M Crossfire 7970M X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 740 OEM GTX 645 OEM GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti OEM GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire with GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
14.50
+78.8%

HD 7970M Crossfire outperforms GTX 650 Ti Boost by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7970M Crossfire HD 7970M Crossfire
GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti Boost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking385539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.89
Power efficiency5.524.61
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameWimbledon XTGK106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (13 years ago)26 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed850 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1033 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt134 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rateno data66.05
Floating-point processing powerno data1.585 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data144.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 Displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p132
+88.6%
70−75
−88.6%
Full HD102
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Fortnite 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Valorant 120−130
+87.7%
65−70
−87.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+80%
110−120
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Dota 2 90−95
+86%
50−55
−86%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Fortnite 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Valorant 120−130
+87.7%
65−70
−87.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Dota 2 90−95
+86%
50−55
−86%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Valorant 120−130
+87.7%
65−70
−87.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+83.3%
60−65
−83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+88%
75−80
−88%
Valorant 150−160
+87.5%
80−85
−87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Valorant 80−85
+80%
45−50
−80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 50−55
+96.3%
27−30
−96.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and GTX 650 Ti Boost compete in popular games:

  • HD 7970M Crossfire is 89% faster in 900p
  • HD 7970M Crossfire is 85% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.50 8.11
Recency 1 May 2012 26 March 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 134 Watt

HD 7970M Crossfire has a 78.8% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 650 Ti Boost, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 49.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 590 GeForce GTX 590
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
RTX 4070 SUPER NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
FirePro W2100 W2100
GTX 745 OEM NVIDIA GTX 745 OEM
vs
HD 8570D 8570D
RTX 3050 6 GB NVIDIA RTX 3050 6 GB
vs
HD 7660D 7660D
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
HD 8470D 8470D
RTX 4090 Max-Q NVIDIA 4090 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 1080 Ti
UHD Graphics 617 Intel Graphics 617
vs
Quadro M1200 M1200
T500 Max-Q T500 Max-Q
vs
Quadro M1200 M1200
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Intel Xe MAX Graphics
vs
HD 6990M 6990M
GT 730 OEM NVIDIA GT 730 OEM
vs
GTS 450 450
RTX 4050 Max-Q NVIDIA RTX 4050 Max-Q
vs
GTS 450 450

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 446 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire or GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.