Radeon Pro 5500M vs HD 7970

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970 with Radeon Pro 5500M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
13.60

Pro 5500M outperforms HD 7970 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.38no data
Power efficiency3.7714.30
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date22 December 2011 (12 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate118.4139.2
Floating-point processing power3.789 TFLOPS4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length274 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970 13.60
Pro 5500M 17.56
+29.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970 5248
Pro 5500M 6774
+29.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7970 7770
Pro 5500M 14725
+89.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7970 6862
Pro 5500M 10399
+51.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7970 43795
Pro 5500M 65776
+50.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p105
−23.8%
130−140
+23.8%
Full HD92
+64.3%
56
−64.3%
1440p40−45
−35%
54
+35%
4K18−21
−50%
27
+50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.97no data
1440p13.73no data
4K30.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−31.8%
55−60
+31.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−33.3%
35−40
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−29.7%
45−50
+29.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−25.8%
110−120
+25.8%
Hitman 3 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−24.3%
85−90
+24.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−32.6%
60−65
+32.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−97.4%
75
+97.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31.8%
55−60
+31.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−31.8%
55−60
+31.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−85.2%
50
+85.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−29.7%
45−50
+29.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−25.8%
110−120
+25.8%
Hitman 3 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−24.3%
85−90
+24.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+43.8%
32
−43.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−34.2%
51
+34.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31.8%
55−60
+31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−24.2%
40−45
+24.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−29.6%
35
+29.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−25.8%
110−120
+25.8%
Hitman 3 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−24.3%
85−90
+24.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31.8%
55−60
+31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−18.2%
39
+18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−42.1%
54
+42.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−39.1%
95−100
+39.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−78.3%
41
+78.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−36.9%
115
+36.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−59.1%
35
+59.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Hitman 3 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16
+33.3%

This is how HD 7970 and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5500M is 24% faster in 900p
  • HD 7970 is 64% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5500M is 35% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5500M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7970 is 44% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5500M is 97% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7970 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Pro 5500M is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.60 17.56
Recency 22 December 2011 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 5500M has a 29.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 252.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970
Radeon HD 7970
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 300 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 259 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.