Radeon PRO W7700 vs HD 7970 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated57
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.22
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameNew ZealandNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 August 2012 (12 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed925 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate118.4499.2
Floating-point processing power3.789 gflopsno data
ROPs3296
TMUs128192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length292 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 August 2012 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 190 Watt

PRO W7700 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 163.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7970 X2 and Radeon PRO W7700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970 X2 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
Radeon HD 7970 X2
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.