ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs HD 7870M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870M with Radeon HD 5850, including specs and performance data.

HD 7870M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
3.60

ATI HD 5850 outperforms HD 7870M by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking747667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.55
Power efficiency6.102.39
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameHeathrowCypress
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)30 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401440
Core clock speed800 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0052.20
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS2.088 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4072

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7870M 3.60
ATI HD 5850 4.74
+31.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7870M 1507
ATI HD 5850 1988
+31.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870M 2702
ATI HD 5850 3401
+25.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7870M 13065
ATI HD 5850 13267
+1.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
−47.5%
59
+47.5%
Full HD40−45
−42.5%
57
+42.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
God of War 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Fortnite 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
God of War 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Valorant 50−55
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−25.8%
80−85
+25.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Dota 2 30−35
−24.2%
40−45
+24.2%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Fortnite 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
God of War 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Valorant 50−55
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Dota 2 30−35
−24.2%
40−45
+24.2%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
God of War 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Valorant 50−55
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Valorant 35−40
−40.5%
50−55
+40.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
God of War 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Valorant 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Dota 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
God of War 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 7870M and ATI HD 5850 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is 48% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5850 is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5850 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is ahead in 58 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 4.74
Recency 24 April 2012 30 September 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 151 Watt

HD 7870M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 235.6% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 5850, on the other hand, has a 31.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 5850 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870M
Radeon HD 7870M
ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 274 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7870M or Radeon HD 5850, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.