HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon HD 7870

Place in the ranking	405	759
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.99	no data
Power efficiency	4.70	14.20
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Pitcairn	Kaby Lake GT2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 March 2012 (12 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	192
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.00	24.00
Floating-point processing power	2.56 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	3
TMUs	80	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.00
+286%

HD Graphics 630 3.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7870 4625
+286%

HD Graphics 630 1197

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870 6194
+258%

HD Graphics 630 1729

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7870 21348
+178%

HD Graphics 630 7685

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	84 +300%	21−24 −300%
Full HD	69 +360%	15 −360%
1440p	240−250 +275%	64 −275%
4K	70−75 +268%	19 −268%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.06	no data
1440p	1.45	no data
4K	4.99	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+217%

6−7

−217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +460%	5 −460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +367%	6 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +313%	8 −313%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +300%	20 −300%
Hitman 3	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +178%	21−24 −178%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +300%	10 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +371%	7 −371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +225%	12 −225%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +76.9%	35−40 −76.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +367%	6−7 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +313%	8−9 −313%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +433%	15 −433%
Hitman 3	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +178%	21−24 −178%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +900%	4 −900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +313%	8−9 −313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +200%	12−14 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +87.5%	16 −87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +76.9%	35−40 −76.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +367%	6−7 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +371%	16−18 −371%
Hitman 3	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +178%	21−24 −178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +200%	12−14 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +76.9%	35−40 −76.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+313%

8−9

−313%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +360%	5−6 −360%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +314%	14−16 −314%
Hitman 3	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +213%	8−9 −213%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +295%	18−20 −295%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+233%

6−7

−233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Hitman 3	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +300%	14−16 −300%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+175%

4−5

−175%

This is how HD 7870 and HD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

HD 7870 is 300% faster in 900p
HD 7870 is 360% faster in 1080p
HD 7870 is 275% faster in 1440p
HD 7870 is 268% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7870 is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, HD 7870 surpassed HD Graphics 630 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.00	3.11
Recency	5 March 2012	1 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	15 Watt

HD 7870 has a 285.9% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 630 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.