GeForce PCX 5750 vs Radeon HD 7870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 and GeForce PCX 5750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7870
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
12.02
+13256%

HD 7870 outperforms PCX 5750 by a whopping 13256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4081463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Power efficiency4.730.12
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code namePitcairnNV39
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)17 February 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate80.001.700
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.02
+13256%
PCX 5750 0.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7870 4620
+13488%
PCX 5750 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p840−1
Full HD66-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Elden Ring 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Elden Ring 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Fortnite 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1
World of Tanks 160−170
+16500%
1−2
−16500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Elden Ring 18−20 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1
World of Tanks 85−90 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 30−33 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Elden Ring 8−9 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.02 0.09
Recency 5 March 2012 17 February 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7870 has a 13255.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

PCX 5750, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce PCX 5750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce PCX 5750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 646 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate GeForce PCX 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.