ATI Radeon 7200 vs RX 7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	92	1544
Place by popularity	90	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	90.14	no data
Power efficiency	17.95	no data
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	Navi 33	R100
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2023 (1 year ago)	1 April 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$269	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	no data
Core clock speed	1720 MHz	166 MHz
Boost clock speed	2655 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,300 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	339.8	1
Floating-point processing power	21.75 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	2
TMUs	128	6
Ray Tracing Cores	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	AGP 4x
Length	204 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	5.312 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1	1x VGA
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	7.0
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.3
OpenCL	2.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	141	no data
1440p	71	no data
4K	36	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	1.91	no data
1440p	3.79	no data
4K	7.47	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	24 May 2023	1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	6 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	23 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---