Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7870 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 XT with Quadro T1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7870 XT
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 185 Watt
11.57

T1000 Mobile outperforms HD 7870 XT by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking382301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.924.27
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameTahitiN19P-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date19 November 2012 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$270 no data
Current price$133 (0.5x MSRP)$1890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T1000 Mobile has 9% better value for money than HD 7870 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed925 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate93.6069.84
Floating-point performance2,995 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7870 XT and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 XT 11.57
T1000 Mobile 16.93
+46.3%

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7870 XT by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7870 XT 4469
T1000 Mobile 6540
+46.3%

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7870 XT by 46% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7870 XT 6390
T1000 Mobile 8727
+36.6%

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7870 XT by 37% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−60%
64
+60%
4K30−35
−60%
48
+60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Far Cry 5 49
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Metro Exodus 83
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Far Cry 5 41
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Forza Horizon 4 114
−40.4%
160−170
+40.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Metro Exodus 54
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 58
−37.9%
80−85
+37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Far Cry 5 31
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
−40%
70−75
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Hitman 3 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

This is how HD 7870 XT and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 60% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.57 16.93
Recency 19 November 2012 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 XT is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Radeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.