Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 7770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770 with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

HD 7770
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
5.65

T1000 outperforms HD 7770 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking604327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Power efficiency4.8623.14
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 February 2012 (12 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate40.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.65
Quadro T1000 16.81
+198%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2172
Quadro T1000 6463
+198%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−177%
130−140
+177%
Full HD46
−183%
130−140
+183%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Elden Ring 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Valorant 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dota 2 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Elden Ring 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Fortnite 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Valorant 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
World of Tanks 128
−173%
350−400
+173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dota 2 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Valorant 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Elden Ring 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
World of Tanks 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Valorant 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Elden Ring 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Fortnite 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Valorant 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how HD 7770 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 177% faster in 900p
  • Quadro T1000 is 183% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 16.81
Recency 15 February 2012 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro T1000 has a 197.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 946 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 422 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.