Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 7770

Place in the ranking	607	329
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.45	no data
Power efficiency	4.86	23.17
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 February 2012 (12 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.28 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	40	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	210 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.65

Quadro T1000 16.83
+198%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2172

Quadro T1000 6467
+198%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	47 −198%	140−150 +198%
Full HD	46 −183%	130−140 +183%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.46

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Valorant	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Dota 2	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −196%	80−85 +196%
Fortnite	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −198%	140−150 +198%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Valorant	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
World of Tanks	128 −173%	350−400 +173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Dota 2	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −196%	80−85 +196%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −198%	140−150 +198%
Valorant	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −186%	100−105 +186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
World of Tanks	40−45 −193%	120−130 +193%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Valorant	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Dota 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Fortnite	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Valorant	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%

This is how HD 7770 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

Quadro T1000 is 198% faster in 900p
Quadro T1000 is 183% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.65	16.83
Recency	15 February 2012	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	50 Watt

Quadro T1000 has a 197.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.