Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon HD 7770

Place in performance ranking	565	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.38	10.06
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 February 2012 (12 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$129.99	$6,299
Current price	$300 (2.3x MSRP)	$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 2547% better value for money than HD 7770.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	4608
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	509.8

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	210 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Eyefinity	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.61

RTX 6000 48.72
+768%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 7770 by 768% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7770 2171

RTX 6000 18872
+769%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 7770 by 769% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	47 −751%	400−450 +751%
Full HD	47 −751%	400−450 +751%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
−733%

75−80

+733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
Hitman 3	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −750%	85−90 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
Hitman 3	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −750%	85−90 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Hitman 3	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Hitman 3	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

This is how HD 7770 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

RTX 6000 is 751% faster than HD 7770

1080p resolution:

RTX 6000 is 751% faster than HD 7770

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	5.61	48.72
Recency	15 February 2012	13 August 2018
Cost	$129.99	$6299
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	260 Watt