Radeon RX 6750 XT vs HD 7750M

Place in the ranking	767	47
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	51.91
Power efficiency	7.64	14.92
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Chelsea	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	575 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	416.0
Floating-point processing power	0.5888 TFLOPS	13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7750M 3.10

RX 6750 XT 54.07
+1644%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7750M 1191

RX 6750 XT 20782
+1645%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7750M 2085

RX 6750 XT 48327
+2218%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9−10 −1733%	165 +1733%
1440p	4−5 −2075%	87 +2075%
4K	2−3 −2450%	51 +2450%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.33
1440p	no data	6.31
4K	no data	10.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1744%	166 +1744%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −2257%	165 +2257%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1344%	130 +1344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −814%	64 +814%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −2353%	368 +2353%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −4633%	142 +4633%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −2400%	150 +2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Valorant	4−5 −5700%	230−240 +5700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1111%	109 +1111%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −671%	54 +671%
Dota 2	9−10 −1667%	159 +1667%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −188%	49 +188%
Fortnite	16−18 −1171%	210−220 +1171%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1927%	304 +1927%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −4433%	130−140 +4433%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −1700%	162 +1700%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1900%	120 +1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −668%	210−220 +668%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1482%	170−180 +1482%
Valorant	4−5 −5700%	230−240 +5700%
World of Tanks	55−60 −407%	270−280 +407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −967%	96 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −600%	49 +600%
Dota 2	9−10 −1356%	131 +1356%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −559%	110−120 +559%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1633%	260 +1633%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −4200%	129 +4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −668%	210−220 +668%
Valorant	4−5 −5700%	230−240 +5700%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −10500%	106 +10500%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −5200%	106 +5200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −695%	170−180 +695%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1562%	300−350 +1562%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −78.1%	57 +78.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −650%	30 +650%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −2186%	160−170 +2186%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −9200%	186 +9200%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −2275%	95−100 +2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1700%	100−110 +1700%
Valorant	10−11 −1890%	190−200 +1890%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −550%	104 +550%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −593%	104 +593%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1989%	180−190 +1989%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1850%	35−40 +1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −550%	104 +550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3300%	65−70 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −550%	13 +550%
Dota 2	16−18 −531%	101 +531%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3033%	90−95 +3033%
Fortnite	2−3 −4400%	90−95 +4400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −9800%	99 +9800%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −5600%	55−60 +5600%
Valorant	3−4 −3600%	110−120 +3600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

126

+0%

126

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	33 +0%	33 +0%
Metro Exodus	47 +0%	47 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

This is how HD 7750M and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 1733% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 2075% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 2450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 10500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is ahead in 60 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.10	54.07
Recency	24 April 2012	3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	250 Watt

HD 7750M has 792.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 1644.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7750M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.