HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon HD 7730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7290 7330M 7350M 7370M 7400G 7410M 7420G 7430M 7450A 7450M 7470A 7470M 7490M 7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M 7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand 7730M 7750M 7770M 7850M 7870M 7950M 7970M 7970M Crossfire 7970M X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
400 400 (Braswell) 405 500 505 510 520 530 610 615 620 630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7730M and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7730M
2012
2 GB DDR3, 25 Watt
1.89
+81.7%

HD 7730M outperforms HD Graphics 400 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7730M HD 7730M
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9521146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.8213.35
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameChelseaBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (14 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed575 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed675 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate21.607.200
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs3212
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+100%
9−10
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Valorant 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Valorant 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how HD 7730M and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • HD 7730M is 100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.89 1.04
Recency 24 April 2012 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

HD 7730M has a 82% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 317% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7730M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7730M Radeon HD 7730M
vs
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M
HD 7730M Radeon HD 7730M
vs
R8 M445DX Radeon R8 M445DX
R7 M460 AMD Radeon R7 M460
vs
ATI X1900 XTX Radeon X1900 XTX
R7 M460 AMD Radeon R7 M460
vs
6800 GTO GeForce 6800 GTO
R7 M460 AMD Radeon R7 M460
vs
NVS 280 PCI NVS 280 PCI
R7 M460 AMD Radeon R7 M460
vs
RX 7700S RX 7700S
HD 7730M AMD Radeon HD 7730M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5430 Radeon HD 5430
HD 7730M AMD Radeon HD 7730M
vs
ATI 7500 Radeon 7500
HD 7730M AMD Radeon HD 7730M
vs
8600 GTS GeForce 8600 GTS
HD 7730M AMD Radeon HD 7730M
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
HD 7730M AMD Radeon HD 7730M
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107
HD 7730M AMD Radeon HD 7730M
vs
RX 6600 XT RX 6600 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7730M or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.