GRID A100A vs Radeon HD 7670A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking800not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.18no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTurksGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4806912
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1005 MHz
Number of transistors716 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40434.2
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs24432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1,866 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 400 Watt

HD 7670A has 788.9% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7670A and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7670A is a notebook card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon HD 7670A
NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.