Radeon R5 (Carrizo) vs HD 7650A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7650A and Radeon R5 (Carrizo), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7650A
2012
1 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.26

R5 (Carrizo) outperforms HD 7650A by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7650A HD 7650A
R5 (Carrizo) R5 (Carrizo)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1050975
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency3.083.69
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameOnegaCarrizo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2012 (13 years ago)4 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480256
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors716 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.26 1.60
Recency 5 January 2012 4 June 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 12 Watt

R5 (Carrizo) has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 175% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650A in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 7650A
Radeon HD 7650A
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7650A Radeon HD 7650A
vs
GeForce 820A GeForce 820A
R5 (Carrizo) Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
HD 7650A Radeon HD 7650A
vs
GT 550M GeForce GT 550M
R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
R7 M465X Radeon R7 M465X
vs
R8 M535DX Radeon R8 M535DX
PlayStation 4 GPU PlayStation 4 GPU
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
HD 7690M Rebrand Radeon HD 7690M Rebrand
vs
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
HD 7470A Radeon HD 7470A
vs
R6 M335DX Radeon R6 M335DX
HD 7690M XT Rebrand Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand
vs
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
Pro 575X Radeon Pro 575X
HD 6670A Radeon HD 6670A
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
HD 6670A Radeon HD 6670A
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
HD 6670A Radeon HD 6670A
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650A or Radeon R5 (Carrizo), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.