GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs Radeon HD 7640G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1059not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.52no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteG80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 February 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25696
Core clock speed496 MHz513 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt143 Watt
Texture fill rate10.9624.62
Floating-point processing power0.3507 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared320 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared792 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data63.36 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 12 February 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 143 Watt

HD 7640G has an age advantage of 5 years, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 308.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7640G and GeForce 8800 GTS 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G is a notebook card while GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Radeon HD 7640G
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 162 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.