Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Aggregated performance score
Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 2984% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 914 | 57 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 10.06 |
Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Turing (2018−2021) |
GPU code name | no data | TU102 |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 May 2012 (11 years old) | 13 August 2018 (5 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $6,299 |
Current price | $90 | $3083 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 4608 |
Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1770 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 18,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 260 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 509.8 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 24 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 672.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 57
−2970%
| 1750−1800
+2970%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−2900%
|
300−310
+2900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−2900%
|
210−220
+2900%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−2900%
|
300−310
+2900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−2900%
|
210−220
+2900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−2900%
|
120−130
+2900%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−2900%
|
270−280
+2900%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−2900%
|
210−220
+2900%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
This is how HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- RTX 6000 is 2970% faster than HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.58 | 48.72 |
Recency | 15 May 2012 | 13 August 2018 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.