GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, including specs and performance data.
RTX 3090 Ti outperforms HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 4586% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1002 | 20 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 18.75 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.90 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | no data | GA102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 27 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 10752 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1860 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 450 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 625.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 40 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 112 |
| TMUs | no data | 336 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 336 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 84 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 6 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 336 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1,008 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 57
−268%
| 210
+268%
|
| 1440p | 3−4
−4633%
| 142
+4633%
|
| 4K | 2−3
−4950%
| 101
+4950%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 9.52 |
| 1440p | no data | 14.08 |
| 4K | no data | 19.79 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−31900%
|
300−350
+31900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−7200%
|
219
+7200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−2257%
|
160−170
+2257%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−6033%
|
180−190
+6033%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−31900%
|
300−350
+31900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−6600%
|
201
+6600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−5050%
|
200−210
+5050%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−5940%
|
300−350
+5940%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−3078%
|
280−290
+3078%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−9900%
|
200
+9900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−2257%
|
160−170
+2257%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1650%
|
170−180
+1650%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1091%
|
400−450
+1091%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−6033%
|
180−190
+6033%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−31900%
|
300−350
+31900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
−742%
|
270−280
+742%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−5667%
|
173
+5667%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−1106%
|
217
+1106%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−5050%
|
200−210
+5050%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−5940%
|
300−350
+5940%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−3078%
|
280−290
+3078%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−9300%
|
188
+9300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−8400%
|
170
+8400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−2257%
|
160−170
+2257%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−8800%
|
178
+8800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1650%
|
170−180
+1650%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−5529%
|
394
+5529%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1091%
|
400−450
+1091%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−6033%
|
180−190
+6033%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4967%
|
152
+4967%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−983%
|
195
+983%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−5050%
|
200−210
+5050%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−3078%
|
280−290
+3078%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−2257%
|
160−170
+2257%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1650%
|
170−180
+1650%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−2657%
|
193
+2657%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1091%
|
400−450
+1091%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
−5940%
|
300−350
+5940%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−5475%
|
220−230
+5475%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−5060%
|
500−550
+5060%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−1067%
|
170−180
+1067%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−5963%
|
450−500
+5963%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−10300%
|
104
+10300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−9100%
|
180−190
+9100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−6175%
|
250−260
+6175%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
−9600%
|
95−100
+9600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−8800%
|
170−180
+8800%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−4933%
|
150−160
+4933%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1107%
|
181
+1107%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−4025%
|
300−350
+4025%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−9100%
|
184
+9100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−4700%
|
95−100
+4700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3850%
|
75−80
+3850%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 151
+0%
|
151
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 125
+0%
|
125
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 84
+0%
|
84
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 173
+0%
|
173
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
This is how HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:
- RTX 3090 Ti is 268% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3090 Ti is 4633% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3090 Ti is 4950% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 31900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 3090 Ti performs better in 53 tests (80%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.42 | 66.54 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 27 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 8 nm |
RTX 3090 Ti has a 4585.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
