GeForce2 MX 400 vs Radeon HD 7570M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1085not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.21no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameThamesNV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)3 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed500 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.000.8
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

HD 7570M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7570M and GeForce2 MX 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7570M is a notebook card while GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Radeon HD 7570M
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 108 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.