ATI All-In-Wonder HD vs Radeon HD 7560D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1054not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency1.27no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteRV635
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)28 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256120
Core clock speed760 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate12.165.776
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data232 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared594 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.01 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 28 June 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

HD 7560D has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI All-In-Wonder HD, on the other hand, has 18.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560D and All-In-Wonder HD. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
ATI All-In-Wonder HD
All-In-Wonder HD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 134 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.